The outcome showed amounts of PCM somewhat determined by the kind out-of relationships (H(2) = ; p =
Moral Factors
All the ethical issues have been secured, with regards to the guidance off Solution Zero. of the Ministry of Health. The perform is actually approved by the Ethics and you may Look Chamber away from the newest Centro de Filosofia elizabeth Ciencias Humanas of your Universidade Federal perform Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) (CAAE Zero. 03490118.8. and Method Zero. step 3.). To the front-page of one’s on the web questionnaire, you will find the new Free and you can Told Consent Title (FICT), and this presented information Tryck pÃ¥ den här länken regarding the risks and you can benefits associated with answering the new studies, therefore the guarantee regarding detachment away from concur, as opposed to prejudice as well as any moment. Only those members whom looked the brand new agree solution had entry to the research content. People who didn’t browse the consent choice have been rerouted so you’re able to the conclusion the newest survey.
To research you are able to differences in PCM and NCM, with regards to the sociodemographic variables: sex, job, proper care of more youthful siblings, presence otherwise absence of a partner, and having or perhaps not which have people, comparisons ranging from organizations have been made by using the Mann-Whitney You decide to try ( Desk 1).
In the 1st, the connection between PCM and you will NCM is analyzed and it is found that PCM (Yards = ; DP = ) correlates negatively toward NCM (M = ; DP = ); p =
Statistically significant differences with small effect sizes were found in PCM in three categories tested: occupation (U = 37; p = .035; PS est = .47), presence/absence of partner (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .29) and presence/absence of children (U = 21; p = .002; PS est = .44). It was observed that the participants who were unemployed (Mdn = ), who had one or more children (Mdn = ) and who were in a relationship (Mdn = ); had significantly higher levels of PCM than people who worked (Mdn = ), who had no children (Mdn = ) and who did not have a relationship (Mdn = ).
On the other hand, NCM indicated statistically significant differences with small effect sizes related to sex (U = 19; p = .000; PS est = .43) and the presence/absence of children (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .34). It was observed that both women (Mdn = ) as for the participants who do not have children (Mdn = ) have significantly higher levels of NCM than men (Mdn = ) and participants with children (Mdn = ).
Based on the results obtained in the comparison between people who are or are not in a stable relationship, we tested the possible differences in PCM according to the type of relationship using the Kruskal Wallis test. 000). Mann-Whitney tests were used to follow up on this finding. A Bonferroni correction was applied and all effects were tested at the .02 level. PCM levels showed no differences between people who were dating and people who were married or in a stable union (U = 29; p = .039; PS est = .47). However, statistically significant differences were found in PCM levels between married and in a stable union (U = 5; p = .000; PS est = .41), of which married people (Mdn = ) had higher levels of PCM when compared to people who were in a stable union (Mdn = ).
Two Spearman correlations was indeed conducted. 000; roentgen = -.494; roentgen 2 = .24. About 2nd study new relationships between PCM, NCM and you may sixteen individual and you can contextual details was indeed checked out and certainly will be seen within the Table dos. Poor contacts had been discover both positive and negative anywhere between PCM or NCM and several of the variables looked at. Especially the sociodemographic parameters: “number of sisters” and you will “beginning order” together with personality activities: “conscientiousness” and “transparency to play” presented no extreme correlations having PCM and you can NCM.