Information, connect with, and candidate sex in the U
101 . Newhagen , John E. , “Past mind-report: Playing with latency to answer model practical question reacting processes into the web-established public-opinion surveys,” regarding the Sourcebook to own Governmental Interaction Look , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and you may Lance Holbert , Roentgen. ( Ny : Routledge , 2011 ).Google Scholar
102 . Oxley , Douglas Roentgen. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John Roentgen. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and Hibbing , John R. , “Governmental thinking are different that have psychological traits,” Research , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Are female expected to choose to own ladies affairs expenses than simply its men colleagues?” Legislative Knowledge Every quarter 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Student
104 . Swers , Michele L. , The difference Female Create: The policy Impact of women for the Congress ( Chicago : College or university away from il Push , 2002 ).Bing Scholar
105 . Slope , Kim Quaile and you will Hurley , Patricia Good. , “A symbol speeches on the You.S. Senate in addition to their representational ramifications,” Log out-of Politics 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle College student
108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Should blacks show blacks and you will female depict women? A contingent ‘yes’,” Record out of Government 1999 , 61 ( step 3 ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner
109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-related political education additionally the detailed sign of females,” Governmental Choices 2003 , twenty-five : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil
110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Is there a good ‘gender affinity effect’ during the Western government? S. Home elections,” Governmental Search Quarterly 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Student
This short beautiful Thessaloniki ladies for marriage article has been cited of the adopting the e-books. Which checklist is done considering investigation provided by Crossref.
Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney A beneficial. and Crave, Ellen 2015. Will it be Gender, Religiosity otherwise Both? A role Congruity Principle of Applicant Electability for the Transitional Tunisia. Viewpoints into the Politics, Vol. 13, Thing. step one, p. 74.
Bauer, Nichole Meters. 2015. Exactly who stereotypes women applicants? Pinpointing individual variations in women label dependence. Government, Teams, and you will Identities, Vol. 3, Material. step 1, p. 94.
Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The newest character of gender in the detailed logo,” Political Lookup Quarterly 1995 , forty eight : 599 – 611
McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, Younger Mie Knisely, Sandra and you may McLeod, Douglas 2015. Whenever feminine assault. Politics plus the Lives Sciences, Vol. 34, Issue. step one, p. forty-two.
Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Giving mixed indicators: the new role out-of gender and partisanship from inside the product reviews regarding political figures. Record from Elections, Public-opinion and you may Parties, Vol. twenty-six, Issue. 4, p. 423.
Koch, Thomas and you may Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. With Cardiovascular system and you can (No) Head? How Receiver Adversely Infer Missing Information about Political leaders and just how It Impacts the fresh new Comparison of one’s Speakermunication Lookup, Vol. 43, Question. 7, p. 972.
Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you can Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Determining Thinking of Feminine People in politics: Your situation away from Poland. Politics into the Central European countries, Vol. 14, Question. step 3, p. seven.
Schneider, Monica C. and you can Bos, Angela L. 2019. The use of Societal Part Idea to the Examination of Gender for the Politics. Political Mindset, Vol. forty, Material. S1, p. 173.
Park, Sunlight More youthful and you will Baek, More youthful Minute 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence for the Women Politicians: As to the reasons Ambivalence Issues to possess Gender Equivalence inside good Democracy. Journal of females, Politics & Rules, Vol. 40, Thing. 2, p. 309.
Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Reputation Murder and you may Ladies in Politics. Corvinus Record from Worldwide Activities, Vol. cuatro, Matter. step one, p. 15.
Aaldering, Loes and you will Van Der Pas, Daphne Joanna 2020. Political Leaders throughout the Media: Gender Prejudice when you look at the Chief Stereotypes during Promotion and you can Program Minutes. United kingdom Record from Governmental Technology, Vol. 50, Question. step 3, p. 911.
Boer, Noortje 2020. Just how can Customers Evaluate Highway?Height Bureaucrats’ Warmth and you can Skills? A good Typology and you will Sample. Personal Management Review, Vol. 80, Topic. cuatro, p. 532.